Several years ago, I was consulting with a client in the staffing industry that was having a profitability problem:
We have happy customers and seem to be doing well, but we just aren’t making more money…
Sound familiar?
After visiting with the frustrated owner of the business, I visited various departments to understand the people and processes behind the numbers.
Operations
My first stop was at the operations department to learn about how the jobs were staffed. I found out that on any given job, the company utilized both 1099 employees and W2 employees. I asked them if they had the ability to track which type of employee worked on which job and they let me know that they could.
(Intuit offers a great visual aid on the difference between 1099 and W2 workers here).
Sales
Next, I met with the sales department to determine how they were setting prices. I learned that they priced their services on a cost-plus basis using a markup of between 30% and 50%.
Their sales force also related to me that they were constantly being beaten up on price by their customers.
Accounting
My last stop was to the accounting department to see what the financial statements could tell me about the company’s lackluster profitability. Among other things, I found that overhead was running 20%-25%.
Findings for Pricing for Profit Case Study
Based upon all of my investigating and conversations with the various departments within the company, I found several issues:
Additional costs were not reflected in price.
The type of employee that would be used on the job (1099 vs. W2) was not taken into account when the job was bid. Consequently, the additional cost of the payroll taxes for using W2 employees was not being captured in the price.
Margin and markup were used interchangeably.
The sales department had assumed a 30%-50% markup was the same as a 30%-50% margin when setting prices. Further, they did not understand the impact this confusion had on profitability.
(See Margin vs. Markup for further explanation of the difference).
Overhead couldn’t be covered.
The current pricing structure was not sufficient to cover the company’s overhead and still allow for a profit.
The answer seemed simple; the company had a pricing problem.
The wrinkle was that the sales force was already feeling great pressure to keep prices low in order to keep their customers, and didn’t have the confidence to approach them about a price increase.
Solution
My solution was to put together a communication tool for the sales force. The tool was nothing more than a spreadsheet that broke out all the costs associated with delivering the service down to net income.
But its real value was in the confidence that it gave the sales people. Not only did it allow them to understand what it would take to make a sale profitable, it gave them…
- A justification to go to their customers and ask for a nominal 1%-2% increase in price
- A working bid model for new customers
Takeaway
In a situation such as this one, it’s easy to default to the old & trusty fix: Reduce overhead. Cut costs.
But this is where the rubber meets the road in being a financial leader or CFO. The problem is so often more complex than large expense accounts on the P&L. You must interact with various departments, think critically and problem solve.
Identifying opportunities like those detailed above comes more naturally after years of experience, but these skills can also be acquired through training. Check out our Financial Leadership Workshhttps://strategiccfo.com/financial-leadership-program/////op Series if you or someone in your company is eager to learn and develop.
Act!
Are you in the same boat as our client? Does it feel as though you should be making more money than you are? Download our Pricing for Profit Inspection Guide below.
Access your Flash Report Execution Plan in SCFO Lab. The step-by-step plan to manage your company before your financial statements are prepared.
Click here to access your Execution Plan. Not a Lab Member?
Click here to learn more about SCFO Labs
