Mark to Market Controversy vs The Laws of Finance

A large part of the mark to market controversy revolves around the fact that mark to market accounting is in direct violation of a fundamental law of finance.

Mark to Market Controversy vs The Laws of Finance

It has long been accepted that when financing assets you should match the term of the debt with the life of the underlying asset. In other words, long term assets should be financed with long term debt and short term assets should be financed with a short term liability.

Mark to Market

Mark to market accounting ignores the liquidity of the underlying asset. In fact, in many respects it converts the characteristics of long term assets into short term assets.

Assume that I am going to finance a house. The house should last at least forty years, consequently, I place a thirty year mortgage on it. Unless I sell the house during the thirty years then I should pay off the mortgage. No problem; everybody wins!

However, what if I were to place a short term debt on a long term asset? I would stand a very good chance of losing my investment in a down economy. The same situation holds true for a lender who makes a long term loan secured by a short term asset.

But a house is a long term asset you say! What is a long term asset? A long term asset is an asset whose expected life is greater than one year. In the case of a mortgage it is a loan whose maturity is greater than one year. The problem with mark to market accounting is that you must treat that asset as if it were sold every day. In effect converting the long term asset into the characteristics of a short term asset.

From the banks perspective you now have a long term asset (ie: mortgage) secured by a short term asset (ie: house). The total opposite of what we are taught in the laws of finance.

Bottom Line

The bottom line is that mark to market accounting distorts the true economics of the transaction versus reflecting it. Mark to market accounting has to go before the banking community can recover.

Download your free External Analysis whitepaper that guides you through overcoming obstacles and preparing how your company is going to react to external factors.

mark to market controversy

Strategic CFO Lab Member Extra

Access your Projections Execution Plan in SCFO Lab. The step-by-step plan to get ahead of your cash flow.

Click here to access your Execution Plan. Not a Lab Member?

Click here to learn more about SCFO Labs

mark to market controversy

See also:
Accounting Income vs Economic Income
Deferrals Definition
Cost Control vs Cost Reduction

, , , , ,

4 Responses to Mark to Market Controversy vs The Laws of Finance

  1. Anonymous April 1, 2009 at 1:54 pm #

    One does not fix a leaking roof by attacking the building plans with correction fluid.

    Fidgeting with accounting rules & financial statements will never fix structural problems. Never has, never will. Ask the Enron guys…

    10/10 for ludicrousness on the Long/Short term angle.

  2. Anonymous February 14, 2010 at 5:50 pm #

    Thanks into sharing. Like often, on the well-to-do and strategic on target!

  3. Anonymous March 9, 2010 at 7:43 am #

    This is the best blog I have ever read thank you!

  4. Anonymous March 23, 2010 at 4:08 pm #

    Understandably your article helped me very much in my college assignment. Hats high to you dispatch, intention look audacious in behalf of more related articles without delay as its anecdote of my pet issue to read.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.